About Me

My photo
I believe and live by the Golden Rule, and I wish the rest of the world did as well.

Saturday, February 11, 2012

How Confusing, Yet Interesting

Children’s Defense Fund publishes a monthly e-newsletter and within the January, addition there is an article about kindergarten for all children in all states.  Within the article, there are links to external fact sheets about the state of education and child well-fair for each state within the United States.  The Children in the States Factsheets 2012l, is an interactive map which provided the basic stats and rankings regarding poverty, health, hunger, child welfare, early childhood development, education and youth at risk for children in each state.  I was very interested in the statistics for the states I am most familiar with Texas, New York, Alaska, Indiana and Massachusetts because they are states I have lived in and have followed for changes in their educational system.  

I learned a great deal about the inequality of expenditures per child for education.
Education in the District of Columbia (1)
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $19,698
Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 1,917/1.88%
Population of children 101,962
Education in New York (2)
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $17,746
Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 58,479/13.44%
 Population of children 4,345,622
Education in Alaska (4)
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $15,353
Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 2,552/ 1.3%
Population of chidlren 185,469
Education in Massachusetts (9)                                                                       
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $14,540
Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 13,924/ .97%
Population of children 1,423,716
Education in Indiana (35)
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $9,254
Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 25,358/1.5%
 Population of children 1,607,469
Education in Texas (42)
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $8,562
Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 98,585/ 1.4%
 Population of children 6,783,873
Education in Utah
Annual expenditure per public school pupil $6,612
However the dropout rate is significantly low Number of 16- to 19-year-olds who have dropped out of high school 9,712/ 1.13%
  Population of children 855,286

The comparison of expenditures spent to drop out rate is interesting; of particular interest was that of NY.  
Washington DC ranks # 1 however dropout rate is 1.88%
New York ranks #2 however dropout rate is 13.44%
Alaska ranks # 4 however dropout rate is 1.3%
Massachusetts ranks #9 however dropout rate is .97%
Indiana ranks # 35 however dropout rate is 1.5%
Texas ranks #42 however dropout rate is 1.4%
Utah ranks #51 however dropout rate is 1.13%

I found the fact that expenditures spend did not affect the dropout rate to be shocking. I thought for sure that as the expenditures went down the dropout rate would go up, but that was not the case. Therefore, it led me to look into the expenditures and student achievement rates.

“Despite the lack of consistent findings, leading researchers in the area acknowledge that any effect of per-pupil expenditures on academic outcomes depends on how the money is spent, not on how much money is spent” (Lips, Watkins, & Fleming. 2008.¶.14). Taxpayers have invested substantial resources in the nation's public schools. However, ever-increasing funding of education has not led to similarly improved student performance. Instead of merely increasing funding for public education, federal and state policymakers should implement education reforms designed to improve resource allocation and enhance student performance.


Lips, D., Watkins,  S., and Fleming, J. (2008). Does Spending More on Education Improve Academic Achievement? The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2008/09/does-spending-more-on-education-improve-academic-achievement

http://cdf.childrensdefense.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=26401.0&dlv_id=0#50states

2 comments:

Christine M said...

Hey Julie,

The stats you provided are amazing and I agree yet confusing. It was interesting to see how you compared the expenditures to the drop out rate. One would assume that if the drop out rate would increase than there would be more money to go somewhere else in a schools budget. Or the expenditures would increase because the funding is not there for the children that dropped out. I think I may have it twisted, but I get the idea. Thanks for sharing and I was never good at math, but trying:)

Christine

Unknown said...

Julie...awesome research! What the world??? LOL! You are right...it's really conflicing! I wonder if it is a typo. I noticed that too. They should have, at least, provided an explanation for the offset in numbers...if possible.